21.3 C
Thursday, June 20, 2024
HomeGlobal NewsSweden Criticised Over Plan to Build at Least 10 New Nuclear Reactors

Sweden Criticised Over Plan to Build at Least 10 New Nuclear Reactors


Related stories

Ukraine’s training: A challenge

Kiev (4/6 – 25)The report from The Washington Post...

Asian roar

Imagine a world where one man’s vision reshapes the...

Ukraine War: Why Central Asian Countries want to Move Away from Russian Control

The terrorist attack on Moscow’s Crocus City Hall in March 2024,...

Suicide rate in Russian Army up

The recent fighting in Kharkiv raises some serious questions...

The Internet eats their Young

London (20/5 - 20). One academic was asked about...

Environmental experts have criticised the Swedish government’s plan to build at least 10 nuclear reactors in the next 20 years, more than doubling the current number, saying it will be too expensive and will come too late to meet energy needs.

The climate minister, Romina Pourmokhtari, announced on Wednesday that in order to meet its climate goals Sweden needed to double electricity production in the next two decades.

The plan for 10 new reactors would mark a dramatic change from the country’s current capacity for nuclear power, with six reactors in operation in Forsmark, Oskarshamn and Ringhals accounting for about 30% of its electricity production.

Lars J Nilsson, a professor at Lund University and a member of the European climate advisory board, said he disputed the government’s claim that the new reactors were needed and dismissed the move as “symbolic”.

“You cannot certainly say that we need 10 new reactors. Right now the expansion of electricity production in Sweden is through wind power,” he told the Guardian. “I don’t expect any new nuclear power in Sweden, unless the government provides quite far-reaching guarantees similar to what you have at Hinkley Point [in the UK].”

The move was more about posturing than action, he said, claiming the government wanted to show it was taking action on meeting its climate goals. “I see it more as symbolic than actually creating any real change.”

If the reactors were built the costs were likely to fall heavily on the Swedish taxpayer, said Nilsson. Having been a hotly debated issue in the past, this latest announcement had had a “lukewarm response”.

Sweden’s reputation as a green leader on the global stage was shifting, he said. “Sweden will partly lose that profile. Now the momentum and progressiveness is coming from the EU and Brussels.”

The EU’s Fit for 55 plan legally requires member states to reduce emissions by at least 55% by 2030 and become “climate neutral” by 2050.

Sweden’s Moderates agreed when they formed a coalition government with the Christian Democrats, Liberals and the far-right Sweden Democrats that more reactors would be permitted and that investments in nuclear power would be made profitable through credit guarantees and changes to pricing.

This week was the first time the government had given an anticipated number of new reactors.”

“Since day one, this government has worked with full force to remove the obstacles erected to prevent new nuclear power,” said Pourmokhtari, a Liberal, who, when she assumed the post last year, became the country’s youngest ever minister. “The climate transition requires a doubling of electricity production in the next 20 years, and nuclear power plays a decisive role for us to succeed in this.”

Karin Lexén, the secretary general of Naturskyddsföreningen, Sweden’s biggest environmental organisation, accused the government of attempting to “divert focus on climate issues”. “They’re diverting focus from what is really needed currently, which is to produce enough electricity by 2030.”

The plan also ignored the progress being made on new methods of storing energy and other developments, she said. “We don’t agree with the energy minister when she said in order to build more wind power we need more nuclear. We think it’s a bit old-fashioned.”

Source : The Guardian

Latest stories